SRIU.L vs. FLMX
SRIU.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and FLMX (Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRIU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while FLMX is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRIU.L returned 12.78%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for FLMX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRIU.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLMX.
Performance
SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SRIU.L is traded in GBp, while FLMX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLMX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRIU.L achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly higher than FLMX's 12.53% return.
SRIU.L
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 13.81%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- —
FLMX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 12.53%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 34.78%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRIU.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 13.81% | 3.18% | 21.24% | 25.25% | -15.68% | 31.46% | -7.21% |
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | 12.53% | 42.67% | -27.20% | 32.38% | 14.57% | 20.71% | 33.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRIU.L and FLMX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2020 | 0.22 |
SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRIU.L
FLMX
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
SRIU.L
FLMX
-
Financial Services
SRIU.L
FLMX
Consumer Cyclical
SRIU.L
FLMX
Industrials
SRIU.L
FLMX
Healthcare
SRIU.L
FLMX
-
Consumer Defensive
SRIU.L
FLMX
Communication Services
SRIU.L
FLMX
Real Estate
SRIU.L
FLMX
Basic Materials
SRIU.L
FLMX
Utilities
SRIU.L
FLMX
-
Energy
SRIU.L
-
FLMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRIU.L vs. FLMX — Risk / Return Rank
SRIU.L
FLMX
SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRIU.L | FLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 2.63 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 9.81 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRIU.L | FLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 1.82 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.71 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.34 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRIU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, smaller than the maximum FLMX drawdown of -46.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIU.L and FLMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRIU.L | FLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.84% | -46.56% | +21.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -13.30% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -31.16% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.56% | -31.16% | +8.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -4.30% | +3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -12.18% | +5.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.56% | -0.58% |
Volatility
SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRIU.L | FLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 4.30% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 15.87% | -6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 19.22% | -7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 20.21% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 23.55% | -2.79% |
SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRIU.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMX's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Dividend Comparison
SRIU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than FLMX's 3.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | 3.56% | 3.99% | 3.31% | 2.90% | 4.22% | 3.15% | 1.48% | 2.95% | 2.51% | 0.31% |
SRIU.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.70% | 0.98% | 0.51% | 0.94% | 1.08% | 0.80% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRIU.L and FLMX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLMX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLMX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SRIU.L.
SRIU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLMX is Latin America Equities. SRIU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FLMX tracks FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIU.L and 0.19% for FLMX.
Find the right allocation for SRIU.L and FLMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer