PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRIU.L vs. FLMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SRIU.L is traded in GBp, while FLMX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLMX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRIU.L achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly higher than FLMX's 12.53% return.


SRIU.L

1D
-0.51%
1M
8.42%
YTD
13.81%
6M
12.98%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

FLMX

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.00%
YTD
12.53%
6M
14.20%
1Y
34.78%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SRIU.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
13.81%3.18%21.24%25.25%-15.68%31.46%-7.21%
FLMX
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
12.53%42.67%-27.20%32.38%14.57%20.71%33.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SRIU.L and FLMX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2020

0.22

SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRIU.L
FLMX

Technology

44.2%

-

Financial Services

12.0%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
1.3%

Industrials

9.9%
12.0%

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
28.5%

Communication Services

3.6%
9.9%

Real Estate

2.8%
6.6%

Basic Materials

1.6%
22.2%

Utilities

0.7%

-

Energy

-

-

Technology

SRIU.L
44.2%
FLMX

-

Financial Services

SRIU.L
12.0%
FLMX
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SRIU.L
11.1%
FLMX
1.3%

Industrials

SRIU.L
9.9%
FLMX
12.0%

Healthcare

SRIU.L
9.1%
FLMX

-

Consumer Defensive

SRIU.L
5.0%
FLMX
28.5%

Communication Services

SRIU.L
3.6%
FLMX
9.9%

Real Estate

SRIU.L
2.8%
FLMX
6.6%

Basic Materials

SRIU.L
1.6%
FLMX
22.2%

Utilities

SRIU.L
0.7%
FLMX

-

Energy

SRIU.L

-

FLMX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRIU.L vs. FLMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRIU.L
SRIU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SRIU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FLMX
FLMX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRIU.LFLMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.32

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.63

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

9.81

-0.65

SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRIU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FLMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRIU.L and FLMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRIU.LFLMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.82

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.71

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.34

+0.31

Drawdowns

SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRIU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, smaller than the maximum FLMX drawdown of -46.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIU.L and FLMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRIU.LFLMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.84%

-46.56%

+21.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-13.30%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-31.16%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

-31.16%

+8.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-4.30%

+3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-12.18%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.56%

-0.58%

Volatility

SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRIU.LFLMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.30%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

15.87%

-6.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

19.22%

-7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

20.21%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

23.55%

-2.79%

SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRIU.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMX's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SRIU.L vs. FLMX - Dividend Comparison

SRIU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than FLMX's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLMX
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
3.56%3.99%3.31%2.90%4.22%3.15%1.48%2.95%2.51%0.31%
SRIU.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.70%0.98%0.51%0.94%1.08%0.80%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRIU.L and FLMX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLMX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLMX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SRIU.L.

SRIU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLMX is Latin America Equities. SRIU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FLMX tracks FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIU.L and 0.19% for FLMX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRIU.L and FLMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer