PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRFMX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SRFMX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sarofim Equity Fund (SRFMX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRFMX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SRFMX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 12.93%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


SRFMX

1D
-1.41%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
0.31%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
8.65%
3Y*
11.52%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
12.93%

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRFMX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRFMX
Sarofim Equity Fund
0.31%11.35%13.67%21.41%-19.20%27.72%24.38%35.64%-6.98%25.90%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SRFMX and ^GSPC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.95

The correlation between SRFMX and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRFMX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRFMX
SRFMX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SRFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SRFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRFMX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sarofim Equity Fund (SRFMX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRFMX^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.32

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.46

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

10.92

-8.01

SRFMX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRFMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRFMX and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRFMX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRFMX drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRFMX and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRFMX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-56.78%

+24.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-9.10%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.95%

-18.90%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

-25.43%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

-33.92%

+1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-3.21%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-10.71%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.04%

+1.15%

Volatility

SRFMX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Sarofim Equity Fund (SRFMX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) have volatilities of 4.67% and 4.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRFMX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

4.89%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

9.93%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

12.57%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.05%

17.00%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

18.08%

+0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SRFMX and ^GSPC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

^GSPC has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to SRFMX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRFMX dropped -32.46% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRFMX and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer