SRET vs. HAUZ
SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) and HAUZ (Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index while HAUZ tracks the iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRET returned 0.63%/yr vs 3.31%/yr for HAUZ. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SRET charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for HAUZ.
Performance
SRET vs. HAUZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRET achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly higher than HAUZ's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SRET has underperformed HAUZ with an annualized return of 0.63%, while HAUZ has yielded a comparatively higher 3.31% annualized return.
SRET
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 0.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.81%
HAUZ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- 6M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- -0.96%
- 10Y*
- 3.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.84M | $1.91M | $2.35M | |
| $590.48K | $702.04K | $782.60K |
SRET vs. HAUZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 8.03% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 22.77% | -5.52% | 17.80% |
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | 0.82% | 22.70% | -5.44% | 6.29% | -22.24% | 9.82% | -6.23% | 20.89% | -9.12% | 27.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRET and HAUZ is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SRET and HAUZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRET vs. HAUZ — Risk / Return Rank
SRET
HAUZ
SRET vs. HAUZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRET | HAUZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.07 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 0.36 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | 0.79 | +5.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRET vs. HAUZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRET drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than HAUZ's maximum drawdown of -39.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRET and HAUZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRET | HAUZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.98% | -39.51% | -27.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -14.08% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.14% | -17.88% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -34.14% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.98% | -39.51% | -27.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.09% | -8.59% | -12.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.46% | -11.73% | -10.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 6.34% | -4.03% |
Volatility
SRET vs. HAUZ - Volatility Comparison
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRET | HAUZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 3.42% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 12.04% | -2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 14.15% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 15.98% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 16.96% | +7.64% |
SRET vs. HAUZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRET has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than HAUZ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRET vs. HAUZ - Dividend Comparison
SRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than HAUZ's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | 3.53% | 4.46% | 4.50% | 3.50% | 1.99% | 4.84% | 3.37% | 3.69% | 1.93% | 2.59% | 2.18% | 9.42% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.89% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRET and HAUZ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRET has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to HAUZ (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRET dropped -66.98% vs HAUZ's -39.51%.
On 10-year performance, HAUZ leads with 3.31% vs 0.63% for SRET. On fees, HAUZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, HAUZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HAUZ has performed better with a 3.31% return vs 0.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAUZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SRET.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 3.53% for HAUZ.
SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SRET and 0.10% for HAUZ.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRET and HAUZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer