PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRET vs. ESGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRET vs. ESGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRET achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly lower than ESGV's 7.69% return.


SRET

1D
0.55%
1M
0.39%
YTD
6.56%
6M
6.91%
1Y
15.46%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
1.19%

ESGV

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
7.69%
6M
6.35%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRET vs. ESGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
6.56%18.09%-1.55%9.85%-18.24%14.00%-36.63%22.77%-7.72%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
7.69%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%33.36%-14.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SRET and ESGV is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between SRET and ESGV has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRET vs. ESGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRET
SRET Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SRET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRET Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SRET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRET Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRET vs. ESGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRETESGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.88

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

7.84

-1.10

SRET vs. ESGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRET Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the ESGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRET and ESGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRET vs. ESGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRET drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than ESGV's maximum drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRET and ESGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRETESGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.98%

-33.66%

-33.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-11.60%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.87%

-20.41%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.43%

-28.81%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.17%

-3.61%

-18.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-6.40%

-16.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.78%

-0.48%

Volatility

SRET vs. ESGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is 3.78%, while Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that SRET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRETESGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

5.59%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

11.22%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.51%

14.12%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

18.48%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.59%

20.59%

+4.00%

SRET vs. ESGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRET has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRET vs. ESGV - Dividend Comparison

SRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, more than ESGV's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.89%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
7.91%7.98%8.72%7.21%8.30%6.33%8.88%7.83%8.54%8.20%8.08%7.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRET and ESGV have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGV has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to SRET (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRET dropped -66.98% vs ESGV's -33.66%.

On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 11.52% vs 1.79% for SRET. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 11.52% return vs 1.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SRET.

SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.91%, compared with 0.89% for ESGV.

SRET is categorized as REIT, while ESGV is Large Cap Blend Equities. SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SRET and 0.09% for ESGV.

ESGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRET and ESGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer