SRET vs. BITW

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) and BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRET is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while BITW is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRET returned 1.79%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for BITW. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRET charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BITW.

Performance

SRET vs. BITW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRET achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly higher than BITW's -35.16% return.

SRET

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 6.56%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: 15.46%
• 3Y*: 11.53%
• 5Y*: 1.79%
• 10Y*: 1.19%

BITW

• 1D: -4.15%
• 1M: -21.33%
• YTD: -35.16%
• 6M: -35.19%
• 1Y: -40.47%
• 3Y*: 49.95%
• 5Y*: 1.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRET vs. BITW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF	6.56%	18.09%	-1.55%	9.85%	-18.24%	14.00%	14.20%
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF	-35.16%	-2.63%	160.69%	331.10%	-85.92%	-36.83%	403.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SRET and BITW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020	0.23

Return for Risk

SRET vs. BITW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRET

SRET Risk / Return Rank: 40
SRET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SRET Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SRET Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SRET Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SRET Martin Ratio Rank: 45

BITW

BITW Risk / Return Rank: 3
BITW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BITW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BITW Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BITW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BITW Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRET vs. BITW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SRET	BITW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	-0.81	+2.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	-1.09	+2.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.88	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	-0.73	+2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.74	-1.24	+7.97

SRET vs. BITW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRET Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the BITW Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRET and BITW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SRET vs. BITW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRET drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, smaller than the maximum BITW drawdown of -96.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRET and BITW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRET	BITW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.98%	-96.46%	+29.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.48%	-55.84%	+46.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.87%	-55.84%	+36.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.43%	-91.93%	+62.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.17%	-72.59%	+50.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.48%	-69.56%	+47.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	32.75%	-30.45%

Volatility

SRET vs. BITW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is 3.78%, while Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) has a volatility of 14.37%. This indicates that SRET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRET	BITW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	14.37%	-10.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.15%	37.20%	-28.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.51%	50.03%	-38.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.50%	65.58%	-49.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.59%	108.32%	-83.73%

SRET vs. BITW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRET has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BITW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SRET vs. BITW - Dividend Comparison

SRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, while BITW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF	7.91%	7.98%	8.72%	7.21%	8.30%	6.33%	8.88%	7.83%	8.54%	8.20%	8.08%	7.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRET and BITW in my portfolio?

SRET and BITW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRET or BITW?

BITW has higher volatility (14.37%) compared to SRET (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRET dropped -66.98% vs BITW's -96.46%.

Which ETF is better, SRET or BITW?

On 5-year performance, SRET leads with 1.79% vs 1.71% for BITW. On fees, SRET is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SRET or BITW?

Over the 5-year period, SRET has performed better with a 1.79% return vs 1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SRET or BITW?

SRET is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BITW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SRET or BITW?

SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.91%, compared with 0.00% for BITW.

What is the main difference between SRET and BITW?

SRET is categorized as REIT, while BITW is Cryptocurrency. SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while BITW tracks Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SRET and 0.75% for BITW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.