PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRCMX vs. PSSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRCMX vs. PSSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal California Municipal Fund (SRCMX) and Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRCMX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than PSSMX's 14.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SRCMX has underperformed PSSMX with an annualized return of 1.90%, while PSSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.73% annualized return.


SRCMX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.75%
1Y
6.39%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
1.90%

PSSMX

1D
-0.85%
1M
0.17%
YTD
14.99%
6M
13.97%
1Y
31.04%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
10.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRCMX vs. PSSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRCMX
Principal California Municipal Fund
1.34%4.39%2.66%5.03%-11.08%1.91%4.85%8.67%-0.19%6.89%
PSSMX
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund
14.99%5.34%16.60%15.18%-16.69%25.39%10.65%21.99%-9.42%12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SRCMX and PSSMX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

-0.11

The correlation between SRCMX and PSSMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRCMX vs. PSSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRCMX
SRCMX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SRCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SRCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

PSSMX
PSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRCMX vs. PSSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal California Municipal Fund (SRCMX) and Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRCMXPSSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.31

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.52

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.06

11.76

-3.70

SRCMX vs. PSSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRCMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the PSSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRCMX and PSSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRCMXPSSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.77

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.30

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.47

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.41

+0.70

Drawdowns

SRCMX vs. PSSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRCMX drawdown since its inception was -23.64%, smaller than the maximum PSSMX drawdown of -58.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRCMX and PSSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRCMXPSSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.64%

-58.43%

+34.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-8.76%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.75%

-24.30%

+19.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.07%

-27.01%

+10.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.07%

-44.85%

+28.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.91%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-9.52%

+6.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

2.62%

-1.83%

Volatility

SRCMX vs. PSSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal California Municipal Fund (SRCMX) is 1.00%, while Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that SRCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRCMXPSSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

4.43%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.00%

11.71%

-9.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

17.48%

-14.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.50%

21.76%

-18.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

22.91%

-18.76%

SRCMX vs. PSSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRCMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PSSMX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRCMX vs. PSSMX - Dividend Comparison

SRCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than PSSMX's 8.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSSMX
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund
8.68%9.98%15.91%3.75%10.45%8.23%1.67%6.56%13.08%6.03%6.15%8.07%
SRCMX
Principal California Municipal Fund
3.48%4.24%3.34%2.31%2.21%2.08%1.94%2.85%3.19%3.16%3.02%4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRCMX and PSSMX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSSMX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to SRCMX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRCMX dropped -23.64% vs PSSMX's -58.43%.

SRCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRCMX and PSSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer