SQS vs. UFO
SQS (Sapient Quality Select ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both Global Equities funds. SQS is actively managed, while UFO is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SQS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.
Performance
SQS vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQS
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFO
- 1D
- -7.80%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 41.55%
- 6M
- 53.43%
- 1Y
- 114.27%
- 3Y*
- 42.70%
- 5Y*
- 14.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SQS vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 8.21% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQS and UFO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQS vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
SQS
UFO
SQS vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQS | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.43 | +1.81 |
Drawdowns
SQS vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQS drawdown since its inception was -7.18%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQS and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQS | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -50.33% | +43.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -19.31% | +15.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -21.81% | +20.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.88% | — |
Volatility
SQS vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQS | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 39.00% | -20.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 30.14% | -11.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 30.90% | -12.08% |
SQS vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQS vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
SQS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.30% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQS and UFO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UFO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UFO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SQS.
UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for SQS.
They also come from different issuers: Sapient and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SQS and 0.75% for UFO.
Find the right allocation for SQS and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer