PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQS vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQS vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SQS

1D
1.43%
1M
-0.43%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BOXX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.41%
6M
1.95%
YTD
2.26%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$253.32M$264.36M$274.97M
$368.93K$275.74K$458.12K

SQS vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SQS and BOXX is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQS vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SQS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SQS vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SQSBOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

8.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

60.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

505.74

SQS vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SQS vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQS drawdown since its inception was -7.90%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQS and BOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQSBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-0.12%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

0.00%

-3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

0.00%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

Volatility

SQS vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQSBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

0.33%

+18.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

0.37%

+18.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

0.37%

+18.15%

SQS vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQS vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither SQS nor BOXX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%
SQS
Sapient Quality Select ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SQS and BOXX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOXX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOXX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SQS.

SQS and BOXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SQS is categorized as Quality Factor, while BOXX is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SQS and 0.19% for BOXX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQS and BOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer