SQBIX vs. FSIRX

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

SQBIX (X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC) and FSIRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, SQBIX returned 7.29%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for FSIRX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SQBIX charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSIRX.

Performance

SQBIX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC (SQBIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQBIX achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than FSIRX's 7.04% return.

SQBIX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: 4.62%
• YTD: 9.50%
• 1Y: 16.11%
• 3Y*: 12.91%
• 5Y*: 7.29%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.03%

FSIRX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.97%
• 6M: 2.18%
• YTD: 7.04%
• 1Y: 12.70%
• 3Y*: 8.29%
• 5Y*: 5.54%
• 10Y*: 5.42%
• ALL TIME*: 4.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SQBIX X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SQBIX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SQBIX X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC	9.50%	11.53%	12.94%	13.93%	-10.67%	9.54%	12.34%	3.70%
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	7.04%	10.38%	5.83%	4.58%	-3.34%	15.89%	3.72%	1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SQBIX and FSIRX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between SQBIX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SQBIX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SQBIX

SQBIX Risk / Return Rank: 79
SQBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SQBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SQBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SQBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SQBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FSIRX

FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SQBIX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC (SQBIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SQBIX	FSIRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.36	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	3.20	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.45	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	3.39	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.99	11.01	-0.02

SQBIX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQBIX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SQBIX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQBIX and FSIRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SQBIX	FSIRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.70%	-33.39%	+13.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.94%	-3.53%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.43%	-5.81%	-8.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.70%	-12.82%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-2.28%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-4.15%	+0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.42%	1.10%	+0.32%

Volatility

SQBIX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC (SQBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.75%. This indicates that SQBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SQBIX	FSIRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.90%	1.75%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.15%	3.99%	+3.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.21%	5.08%	+4.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.77%	6.93%	+4.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.87%	6.75%	+6.12%

SQBIX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQBIX has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

SQBIX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

SQBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than FSIRX's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	3.23%	4.72%	4.80%	5.28%	7.33%	5.37%	2.23%	3.09%	9.42%	2.63%	2.37%	1.75%
SQBIX X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC	1.64%	1.18%	1.74%	0.96%	2.17%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SQBIX and FSIRX in my portfolio?

SQBIX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SQBIX or FSIRX?

SQBIX has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to FSIRX (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQBIX dropped -19.70% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.