SPYQ vs. DLLL
SPYQ (Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SPYQ is actively managed, while DLLL is passively managed. Over the past year, SPYQ returned 51.99% vs 986.47% for DLLL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.
Performance
SPYQ vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYQ achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 816.87% return.
SPYQ
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 18.82%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 51.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- -13.27%
- 1M
- 274.22%
- YTD
- 816.87%
- 6M
- 673.02%
- 1Y
- 986.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYQ vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPYQ Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF | 18.82% | 17.86% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 816.87% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYQ and DLLL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between SPYQ and DLLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYQ vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
SPYQ
DLLL
SPYQ vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYQ | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | 7.72 | -5.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | 5.05 | -2.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.63 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 16.14 | -13.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.80 | 33.77 | -20.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYQ | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 7.72 | -5.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 3.38 | -2.48 |
Drawdowns
SPYQ vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYQ drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, smaller than the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYQ and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYQ | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.88% | -68.58% | +32.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.70% | -57.19% | +38.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.27% | +13.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -25.93% | +21.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 27.33% | -23.17% |
Volatility
SPYQ vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) is 5.11%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 68.33%. This indicates that SPYQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYQ | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 68.33% | -63.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.07% | 101.80% | -83.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.73% | 129.25% | -105.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 130.59% | -95.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 130.59% | -95.95% |
SPYQ vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYQ vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
SPYQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYQ Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYQ and DLLL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (68.33%) compared to SPYQ (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYQ dropped -35.88% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 986.47% vs 51.99% for SPYQ. On fees, SPYQ is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, SPYQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 986.47% return vs 51.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYQ is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
SPYQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SPYQ and 1.50% for DLLL.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.72 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYQ and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer