SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

SPYL.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XS2D.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYL.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500, while XS2D.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPYL.L returned 21.76% vs 39.21% for XS2D.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPYL.L charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XS2D.L.

Performance

SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYL.L achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 17.62% return.

SPYL.L

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 9.88%
• YTD: 10.27%
• 1Y: 21.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XS2D.L

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: 17.03%
• YTD: 17.62%
• 1Y: 39.21%
• 3Y*: 33.50%
• 5Y*: 18.77%
• 10Y*: 23.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPYL.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc	10.27%	17.38%	25.35%	14.40%
XS2D.L Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C	17.62%	26.58%	45.65%	32.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYL.L and XS2D.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023	0.98

The correlation between SPYL.L and XS2D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPYL.L	XS2D.L
Technology	39.1%	56.8%
Financial Services	11.1%	6.0%
Communication Services	10.8%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	9.3%
Healthcare	8.4%	5.7%
Industrials	7.8%	5.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	0.0%
Energy	3.2%	-
Utilities	2.1%	4.9%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.4%
Basic Materials	1.3%	2.2%

Return for Risk

SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYL.L

SPYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SPYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SPYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
SPYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SPYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

XS2D.L

XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPYL.L	XS2D.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.61	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.34	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.28	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	2.31	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.73	9.10	+1.63

SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYL.L and XS2D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYL.L drawdown since its inception was -20.80%, smaller than the maximum XS2D.L drawdown of -59.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.L and XS2D.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYL.L	XS2D.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.80%	-59.31%	+38.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.14%	-16.91%	+8.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-1.97%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.79%	-8.93%	+7.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	4.30%	-2.28%

Volatility

SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) is 2.76%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that SPYL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYL.L	XS2D.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	5.61%	-2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	18.52%	-9.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.96%	24.27%	-12.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.55%	31.89%	-7.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.55%	32.34%	-7.79%

SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYL.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYL.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYL.L nor XS2D.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYL.L and XS2D.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, SPYL.L and XS2D.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SPYL.L or XS2D.L?

On fees, SPYL.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYL.L or XS2D.L?

SPYL.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.

What is the main difference between SPYL.L and XS2D.L?

SPYL.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XS2D.L is Leveraged Equities. SPYL.L tracks S&P 500, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPYL.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.