SPYL.L vs. ENGY.L
SPYL.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ENGY.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYL.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500, while ENGY.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPYL.L returned 27.88% vs 56.77% for ENGY.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPYL.L charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ENGY.L.
Performance
SPYL.L vs. ENGY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPYL.L is traded in USD, while ENGY.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENGY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYL.L achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than ENGY.L's 33.18% return.
SPYL.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENGY.L
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 33.18%
- 6M
- 30.37%
- 1Y
- 56.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
SPYL.L vs. ENGY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYL.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.35% | 17.39% | 25.33% | 14.46% |
ENGY.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 33.18% | 29.76% | -10.93% | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYL.L and ENGY.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023 | 0.11 |
The correlation between SPYL.L and ENGY.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPYL.L vs. ENGY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Financial Services
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Communication Services
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Healthcare
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Industrials
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Consumer Defensive
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Energy
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Utilities
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Real Estate
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Basic Materials
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYL.L vs. ENGY.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPYL.L
ENGY.L
SPYL.L vs. ENGY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYL.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 5.58 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 18.09 | -3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYL.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.53 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.91 | 0.42 | +1.48 |
Drawdowns
SPYL.L vs. ENGY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYL.L drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, smaller than the maximum ENGY.L drawdown of -61.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.L and ENGY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYL.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -61.34% | +42.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.13% | -10.12% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -5.88% | +5.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -12.70% | +10.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 3.13% | -1.23% |
Volatility
SPYL.L vs. ENGY.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) is 3.12%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that SPYL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYL.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 7.86% | -4.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | 18.98% | -10.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.59% | 22.38% | -10.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 25.85% | -11.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 30.92% | -16.96% |
SPYL.L vs. ENGY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYL.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGY.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYL.L vs. ENGY.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPYL.L nor ENGY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYL.L and ENGY.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYL.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYL.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ENGY.L.
SPYL.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ENGY.L is Energy Equities. SPYL.L tracks S&P 500, while ENGY.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPYL.L and 0.18% for ENGY.L.
Find the right allocation for SPYL.L and ENGY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer