PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYL.DE vs. VDCA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYL.DE vs. VDCA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPYL.DE is traded in EUR, while VDCA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDCA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYL.DE achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than VDCA.L's 2.68% return.


SPYL.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.89%
YTD
11.37%
6M
12.66%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VDCA.L

1D
0.44%
1M
1.07%
YTD
2.68%
6M
2.99%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYL.DE vs. VDCA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPYL.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)
11.37%4.71%32.33%9.54%
VDCA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
2.68%-6.70%12.52%-1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYL.DE and VDCA.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYL.DE vs. VDCA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYL.DE
SPYL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VDCA.L
VDCA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VDCA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYL.DE vs. VDCA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYL.DEVDCA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.14

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

1.26

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

3.29

+9.43

SPYL.DE vs. VDCA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the VDCA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYL.DE and VDCA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYL.DE vs. VDCA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYL.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, which is greater than VDCA.L's maximum drawdown of -11.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.DE and VDCA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYL.DEVDCA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.27%

-11.67%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-3.66%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-5.09%

+4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-4.67%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.40%

+0.61%

Volatility

SPYL.DE vs. VDCA.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L) at 1.20%. This indicates that SPYL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDCA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYL.DEVDCA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

1.20%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

4.32%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

6.08%

+5.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

7.42%

+7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.60%

7.40%

+7.20%

SPYL.DE vs. VDCA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYL.DE has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VDCA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYL.DE vs. VDCA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYL.DE nor VDCA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYL.DE and VDCA.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDCA.L.

SPYL.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while VDCA.L is Short-Term Bond. SPYL.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while VDCA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index 1-3 Year. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPYL.DE and 0.09% for VDCA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYL.DE and VDCA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer