PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYJ.DE vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYJ.DE vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (SPYJ.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPYJ.DE is traded in EUR, while IEMG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEMG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYJ.DE achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 27.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYJ.DE has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 3.07%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.


SPYJ.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.98%
YTD
13.86%
6M
15.17%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
3.07%

IEMG

1D
0.82%
1M
1.42%
YTD
27.35%
6M
28.23%
1Y
45.12%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYJ.DE vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYJ.DE
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
13.86%-2.34%4.88%7.77%-20.63%41.27%-18.75%22.75%-2.91%-4.97%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
27.35%16.83%13.53%8.18%-15.02%6.79%8.15%20.48%-10.93%20.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYJ.DE and IEMG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between SPYJ.DE and IEMG has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYJ.DE vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYJ.DE
SPYJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYJ.DE vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (SPYJ.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYJ.DEIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.42

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

4.29

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

14.72

-5.86

SPYJ.DE vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYJ.DE and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYJ.DE vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYJ.DE and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYJ.DEIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.93%

-34.49%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-10.58%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.28%

-17.88%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.70%

-22.55%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.93%

-32.63%

-10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-3.95%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.16%

-9.15%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.07%

-1.06%

Volatility

SPYJ.DE vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (SPYJ.DE) is 4.12%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that SPYJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYJ.DEIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

10.99%

-6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

18.42%

-9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

20.56%

-8.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

17.26%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

19.39%

-2.43%

SPYJ.DE vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYJ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYJ.DE vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

SPYJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than IEMG's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.19%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
SPYJ.DE
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
2.45%2.80%2.70%2.67%2.91%1.76%2.70%2.61%2.24%2.79%2.53%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYJ.DE and IEMG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SPYJ.DE.

SPYJ.DE is categorized as REIT, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. SPYJ.DE tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SPYJ.DE and 0.09% for IEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYJ.DE and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer