SPYA vs. ONEH
SPYA (Twin Oak Endure ETF) and ONEH (TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPYA charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ONEH.
Performance
SPYA vs. ONEH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPYA
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 15.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEH
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYA vs. ONEH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPYA Twin Oak Endure ETF | 3.70% |
ONEH TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYA and ONEH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYA vs. ONEH — Risk / Return Rank
SPYA
ONEH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYA vs. ONEH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) and TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF (ONEH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYA | ONEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.05 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYA vs. ONEH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYA drawdown since its inception was -9.51%, which is greater than ONEH's maximum drawdown of -3.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYA and ONEH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYA | ONEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.51% | -3.55% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -1.19% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -1.49% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | — | — |
Volatility
SPYA vs. ONEH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYA | ONEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 5.31% | +6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.60% | 5.31% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.60% | 5.31% | +6.29% |
SPYA vs. ONEH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEH's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYA vs. ONEH - Dividend Comparison
SPYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while ONEH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ONEH TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYA Twin Oak Endure ETF | 0.36% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYA and ONEH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ONEH.
SPYA has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for ONEH.
They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SPYA and 0.79% for ONEH.
Find the right allocation for SPYA and ONEH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer