SPYA.DE vs. DBX5.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPYA.DE (SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF) and DBX5.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - SPYA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while DBX5.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Custom. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYA.DE returned 10.77%/yr vs 22.04%/yr for DBX5.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYA.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DBX5.DE.

Performance

SPYA.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (SPYA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYA.DE achieves a 32.76% return, which is significantly lower than DBX5.DE's 69.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYA.DE has underperformed DBX5.DE with an annualized return of 10.77%, while DBX5.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 22.04% annualized return.

SPYA.DE

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: 7.19%
• YTD: 32.76%
• 6M: 34.22%
• 1Y: 53.92%
• 3Y*: 22.22%
• 5Y*: 8.39%
• 10Y*: 10.77%

DBX5.DE

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: 14.40%
• YTD: 69.45%
• 6M: 74.72%
• 1Y: 112.23%
• 3Y*: 40.65%
• 5Y*: 22.99%
• 10Y*: 22.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYA.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPYA.DE SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF	32.76%	17.77%	17.39%	3.14%	-16.02%	1.17%	15.21%	21.30%	-11.35%	25.30%
DBX5.DE Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C	69.45%	18.33%	31.08%	24.15%	-25.19%	37.79%	24.51%	39.18%	-5.55%	12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYA.DE and DBX5.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2011	0.73

The correlation between SPYA.DE and DBX5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPYA.DE vs. DBX5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYA.DE

SPYA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 85
SPYA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SPYA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SPYA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SPYA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SPYA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

DBX5.DE

DBX5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 96
DBX5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
DBX5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
DBX5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 95
DBX5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
DBX5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYA.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (SPYA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYA.DE	DBX5.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	4.62	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	5.37	-1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.74	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.82	12.09	-7.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.86	35.84	-18.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYA.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is lower than the DBX5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYA.DE and DBX5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYA.DE	DBX5.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	4.62	-1.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	1.05	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	1.06	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.54	-0.09

Drawdowns

SPYA.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.34%, smaller than the maximum DBX5.DE drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYA.DE and DBX5.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYA.DE	DBX5.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.34%	-55.28%	+19.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	-9.23%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.39%	-30.81%	+9.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.31%	-32.62%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.85%	-32.62%	-1.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.98%	-1.97%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-11.61%	+0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	3.12%	+0.07%

Volatility

SPYA.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (SPYA.DE) is 8.10%, while Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE) has a volatility of 10.28%. This indicates that SPYA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBX5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYA.DE	DBX5.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	10.28%	-2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.09%	19.59%	-3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.17%	24.18%	-5.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.38%	21.58%	-3.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.19%	20.55%	-1.36%

SPYA.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYA.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DBX5.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYA.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYA.DE nor DBX5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYA.DE and DBX5.DE in my portfolio?

SPYA.DE and DBX5.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPYA.DE or DBX5.DE?

On fees, SPYA.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYA.DE or DBX5.DE?

SPYA.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DBX5.DE.

What is the main difference between SPYA.DE and DBX5.DE?

SPYA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while DBX5.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPYA.DE and 0.65% for DBX5.DE.