PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPY5.L vs. ENGW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPY5.L vs. ENGW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPY5.L is traded in USD, while ENGW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ENGW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPY5.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than ENGW.L's 30.47% return.


SPY5.L

1D
0.01%
1M
4.49%
YTD
10.31%
6M
11.16%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
22.16%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
15.36%

ENGW.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
30.47%
6M
29.00%
1Y
47.42%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPY5.L vs. ENGW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.31%17.43%25.36%26.64%-15.29%
ENGW.L
SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF
30.47%15.28%1.82%3.10%11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SPY5.L and ENGW.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.27

The correlation between SPY5.L and ENGW.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPY5.L vs. ENGW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPY5.L
SPY5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ENGW.L
ENGW.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPY5.L vs. ENGW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPY5.LENGW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.40

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.79

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.64

13.05

+1.59

SPY5.L vs. ENGW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPY5.L and ENGW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPY5.LENGW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.30

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.61

+0.33

Drawdowns

SPY5.L vs. ENGW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPY5.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than ENGW.L's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY5.L and ENGW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPY5.LENGW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-26.08%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-12.46%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-18.79%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-5.91%

+5.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-5.95%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

3.62%

-1.72%

Volatility

SPY5.L vs. ENGW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) is 3.17%, while SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that SPY5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPY5.LENGW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

7.75%

-4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

17.69%

-9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

20.55%

-8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

23.71%

-7.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

23.71%

-7.47%

SPY5.L vs. ENGW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPY5.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPY5.L vs. ENGW.L - Dividend Comparison

SPY5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while ENGW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENGW.L
SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.89%0.97%1.06%1.19%1.40%0.99%1.28%1.71%2.20%2.29%1.64%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPY5.L and ENGW.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENGW.L.

SPY5.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ENGW.L is Energy Equities. SPY5.L tracks S&P 500, while ENGW.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY5.L and 0.30% for ENGW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPY5.L and ENGW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer