SPXU vs. IVV
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPXU tracks the S&P 500 Index (-300%) while IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXU returned -41.98%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for IVV. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
SPXU vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -20.19% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXU has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of -41.98%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- -40.85%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -41.98%
IVV
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 23.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
SPXU vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.19% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.20% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and IVV is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | -1.00 |
The correlation between SPXU and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXU vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU
IVV
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPXU
IVV
Basic Materials
SPXU
-
IVV
Communication Services
SPXU
-
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU
-
IVV
Consumer Defensive
SPXU
-
IVV
Energy
SPXU
-
IVV
Healthcare
SPXU
-
IVV
Industrials
SPXU
-
IVV
Real Estate
SPXU
-
IVV
Technology
SPXU
-
IVV
Utilities
SPXU
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
IVV
SPXU vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXU | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.35 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 2.68 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 11.98 | -13.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -55.25% | -44.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.11% | -8.89% | -38.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -18.75% | -65.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -24.53% | -65.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | -33.90% | -65.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -3.14% | -96.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.33% | -10.76% | -82.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.37% | 1.99% | +27.38% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.88%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 4.88% | +9.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 9.85% | +19.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 12.48% | +24.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 16.98% | +33.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.43% | 18.07% | +35.36% |
SPXU vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than IVV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.35% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and IVV have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXU has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to IVV (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.58% vs -41.98% for SPXU. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 1.11% for IVV.
SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%), while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SPXU and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer