PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXT vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXT vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXT achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.


SPXT

1D
-0.56%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
3.53%
6M
2.99%
1Y
16.56%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
9.46%
10Y*
11.61%

IBIC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.49%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXT vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
3.53%15.10%19.93%4.40%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.39%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXT and IBIC is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.03

The correlation between SPXT and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXT vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXT
SPXT Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SPXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXT vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXTIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

2.21

-0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

16.41

-14.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.07

58.11

-49.04

SPXT vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXT and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXT vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXT drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXT and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXTIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-0.90%

-33.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-0.27%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.11%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-0.10%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.08%

+1.75%

Volatility

SPXT vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that SPXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXTIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

0.16%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

0.67%

+7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.56%

0.89%

+9.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

1.57%

+13.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

1.57%

+14.68%

SPXT vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXT vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

SPXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
1.38%1.38%1.29%1.53%1.86%1.15%1.63%1.63%2.03%1.55%2.67%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXT and IBIC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXT has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXT dropped -34.38% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, SPXT leads with 16.56% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, SPXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPXT has performed better with a 16.56% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.38% for SPXT.

SPXT is categorized as S&P 500, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SPXT tracks S&P 500 Ex-Information Technology Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXT and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXT and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer