PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXS.MI vs. VWRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXS.MI vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.MI) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPXS.MI is traded in EUR, while VWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXS.MI achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than VWRA.L's 13.03% return.


SPXS.MI

1D
-0.11%
1M
5.27%
YTD
11.42%
6M
11.54%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
14.98%
10Y*
15.17%

VWRA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.12%
YTD
13.03%
6M
13.50%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXS.MI vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPXS.MI
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.42%4.51%33.86%22.52%-14.49%41.21%7.76%6.71%
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
12.86%7.92%25.41%18.61%-13.03%27.32%6.62%6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXS.MI and VWRA.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019

0.88

The correlation between SPXS.MI and VWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXS.MI vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXS.MI
SPXS.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPXS.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRA.L
VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXS.MI vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.MI) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXS.MIVWRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

4.16

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.16

15.93

-2.77

SPXS.MI vs. VWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXS.MI Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXS.MI and VWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXS.MIVWRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.16

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.84

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.76

+0.19

Drawdowns

SPXS.MI vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXS.MI drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRA.L drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXS.MI and VWRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXS.MIVWRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-33.09%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-6.39%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

-20.09%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.10%

-20.09%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.45%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-4.68%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.67%

+0.29%

Volatility

SPXS.MI vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.MI) is 2.68%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that SPXS.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXS.MIVWRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

3.51%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

9.30%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

12.33%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

14.58%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

16.76%

-0.45%

SPXS.MI vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXS.MI has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXS.MI vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPXS.MI nor VWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXS.MI and VWRA.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXS.MI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXS.MI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.

SPXS.MI is categorized as S&P 500, while VWRA.L is Global Equities. SPXS.MI tracks S&P 500 Index, while VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXS.MI and 0.22% for VWRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXS.MI and VWRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer