PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPXP.L is traded in GBp, while XS2D.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XS2D.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXP.L achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 17.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L has underperformed XS2D.L with an annualized return of -27.50%, while XS2D.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.29% annualized return.


SPXP.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.34%
6M
9.72%
YTD
10.10%
1Y
-98.79%
3Y*
-74.34%
5Y*
-54.72%
10Y*
-27.50%

XS2D.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.25%
6M
16.31%
YTD
17.14%
1Y
37.73%
3Y*
32.04%
5Y*
19.19%
10Y*
23.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.10%-98.90%27.58%20.06%-8.79%31.26%13.90%26.76%0.26%10.77%
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
17.14%17.56%48.20%41.43%-31.85%64.57%17.41%56.67%-10.94%31.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXP.L and XS2D.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2014

0.89

The correlation between SPXP.L and XS2D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXP.L
XS2D.L

Technology

39.0%
56.8%

Financial Services

11.1%
6.0%

Communication Services

10.6%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
5.7%

Industrials

7.8%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
0.0%

Energy

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.1%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.2%

Technology

SPXP.L
39.0%
XS2D.L
56.8%

Financial Services

SPXP.L
11.1%
XS2D.L
6.0%

Communication Services

SPXP.L
10.6%
XS2D.L
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXP.L
9.9%
XS2D.L
9.3%

Healthcare

SPXP.L
8.3%
XS2D.L
5.7%

Industrials

SPXP.L
7.8%
XS2D.L
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPXP.L
4.5%
XS2D.L
0.0%

Energy

SPXP.L
3.1%
XS2D.L

-

Utilities

SPXP.L
2.1%
XS2D.L
4.9%

Real Estate

SPXP.L
1.8%
XS2D.L
2.4%

Basic Materials

SPXP.L
1.7%
XS2D.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

XS2D.L
XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXP.LXS2D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.49

1.28

-0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

2.38

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

8.62

-9.86

SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXP.L and XS2D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than XS2D.L's maximum drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and XS2D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXP.LXS2D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-54.44%

-44.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.07%

-15.77%

-83.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.07%

-36.46%

-62.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.07%

-37.20%

-61.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

-54.44%

-44.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.92%

-2.41%

-96.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-8.12%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

80.35%

4.36%

+75.99%

Volatility

SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) is 2.93%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that SPXP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXP.LXS2D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

5.47%

-2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.90%

17.88%

-9.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.31%

23.63%

+75.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.56%

30.26%

+16.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.90%

31.29%

+3.61%

SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXP.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPXP.L nor XS2D.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SPXP.L and XS2D.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.

SPXP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XS2D.L is Leveraged Equities. SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and XS2D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer