SPXP.L vs. XLKS.L
SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XLKS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L returned 16.32%/yr vs 27.23%/yr for XLKS.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXP.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.
Performance
SPXP.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPXP.L is traded in GBp, while XLKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLKS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXP.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than XLKS.L's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L has underperformed XLKS.L with an annualized return of 16.32%, while XLKS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.23% annualized return.
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 14.28%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 22.23%
- 1Y
- 54.41%
- 3Y*
- 33.26%
- 5Y*
- 26.61%
- 10Y*
- 27.23%
SPXP.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 24.03% | 15.38% | 44.20% | 52.61% | -20.70% | 36.00% | 38.58% | 43.17% | 3.27% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXP.L and XLKS.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SPXP.L and XLKS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXP.L vs. XLKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
Financial Services
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
Communication Services
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
-
Healthcare
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
-
Industrials
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
Consumer Defensive
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
-
Energy
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
-
Utilities
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
-
Real Estate
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
-
Basic Materials
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXP.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPXP.L
XLKS.L
SPXP.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXP.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.44 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 3.20 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.13 | 8.18 | +6.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXP.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 2.68 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.10 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
SPXP.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, smaller than the maximum XLKS.L drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and XLKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXP.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -28.80% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -16.92% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -28.80% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -28.80% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.46% | -28.80% | +3.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -2.80% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -4.71% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 6.63% | -4.70% |
Volatility
SPXP.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) is 2.65%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that SPXP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXP.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 7.55% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 15.35% | -8.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.49% | 20.23% | -9.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 23.02% | -8.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 22.09% | -5.87% |
SPXP.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXP.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPXP.L nor XLKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXP.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKS.L.
SPXP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XLKS.L is Technology Equities. SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.
Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and XLKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer