SPXP.L vs. XLKQ.L
SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L returned 16.32%/yr vs 27.22%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXP.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
SPXP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXP.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 16.32%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.22% annualized return.
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 14.41%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 22.31%
- 1Y
- 54.52%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 26.60%
- 10Y*
- 27.22%
SPXP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 23.81% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 37.93% | 44.63% | 0.92% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXP.L and XLKQ.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2014 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SPXP.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
Financial Services
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
Communication Services
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
-
Healthcare
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
-
Industrials
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
Consumer Defensive
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
-
Energy
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
-
Utilities
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
-
Real Estate
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
-
Basic Materials
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXP.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L
SPXP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.46 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 3.24 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.13 | 8.42 | +6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 2.83 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 1.21 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | 1.33 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
SPXP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -28.74% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -16.76% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -28.74% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -28.74% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.46% | -28.74% | +3.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -2.84% | +2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -5.04% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 6.45% | -4.52% |
Volatility
SPXP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) is 2.65%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that SPXP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 6.83% | -4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 14.29% | -7.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.49% | 19.18% | -8.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 22.04% | -7.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 21.65% | -5.43% |
SPXP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPXP.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXP.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
SPXP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer