PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXP.L vs. SC0J.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXP.L vs. SC0J.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPXP.L is traded in GBp, while SC0J.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SC0J.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXP.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than SC0J.DE's 10.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L has outperformed SC0J.DE with an annualized return of 16.32%, while SC0J.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 14.06% annualized return.


SPXP.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
5.93%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
19.50%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
16.32%

SC0J.DE

1D
-0.30%
1M
5.74%
YTD
10.00%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.42%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXP.L vs. SC0J.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.53%27.58%20.06%-8.79%31.26%13.90%26.76%0.26%10.77%
SC0J.DE
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc
10.00%13.39%20.58%17.92%-8.87%23.40%11.60%24.61%-3.66%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXP.L and SC0J.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014

0.77

The correlation between SPXP.L and SC0J.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXP.L vs. SC0J.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SC0J.DE
SC0J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SC0J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXP.L vs. SC0J.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXP.LSC0J.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.47

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

4.18

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.14

16.42

-1.28

SPXP.L vs. SC0J.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the SC0J.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXP.L and SC0J.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXP.LSC0J.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.55

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.95

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

0.94

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.88

+0.28

Drawdowns

SPXP.L vs. SC0J.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, roughly equal to the maximum SC0J.DE drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and SC0J.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXP.LSC0J.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.46%

-26.52%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-6.52%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-19.67%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-19.67%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.46%

-26.52%

+1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.30%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-3.58%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.67%

+0.26%

Volatility

SPXP.L vs. SC0J.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) is 2.64%, while Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF Acc (SC0J.DE) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that SPXP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0J.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXP.LSC0J.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

3.05%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

7.65%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.56%

10.71%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

13.71%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

14.87%

+1.35%

SPXP.L vs. SC0J.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SC0J.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXP.L vs. SC0J.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPXP.L nor SC0J.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SPXP.L and SC0J.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SC0J.DE.

SPXP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while SC0J.DE is Global Equities. SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while SC0J.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.19% for SC0J.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and SC0J.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer