PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXP.L vs. E127.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPXP.L is traded in GBp, while E127.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the E127.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXP.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than E127.L's 27.98% return.


SPXP.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
5.93%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
19.50%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
16.32%

E127.L

1D
-0.94%
1M
10.42%
YTD
27.98%
6M
30.80%
1Y
58.40%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.53%27.58%20.06%-8.79%31.26%13.75%
E127.L
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist
27.98%25.81%10.12%3.48%-9.65%-1.28%23.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXP.L and E127.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020

0.54

The correlation between SPXP.L and E127.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXP.L
E127.L

Technology

35.6%
36.9%

Financial Services

11.8%
19.5%

Communication Services

11.2%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
2.9%

Industrials

8.3%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.0%

Energy

3.5%
4.1%

Utilities

2.4%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
6.6%

Technology

SPXP.L
35.6%
E127.L
36.9%

Financial Services

SPXP.L
11.8%
E127.L
19.5%

Communication Services

SPXP.L
11.2%
E127.L
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXP.L
10.1%
E127.L
9.6%

Healthcare

SPXP.L
8.5%
E127.L
2.9%

Industrials

SPXP.L
8.3%
E127.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

SPXP.L
4.9%
E127.L
3.0%

Energy

SPXP.L
3.5%
E127.L
4.1%

Utilities

SPXP.L
2.4%
E127.L
2.1%

Real Estate

SPXP.L
1.9%
E127.L
1.0%

Basic Materials

SPXP.L
1.8%
E127.L
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXP.L vs. E127.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

E127.L
E127.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
E127.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
E127.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
E127.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
E127.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
E127.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXP.LE127.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.64

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

5.37

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.14

19.32

-4.18

SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the E127.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXP.L and E127.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXP.LE127.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

3.48

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.59

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.76

+0.39

Drawdowns

SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, roughly equal to the maximum E127.L drawdown of -26.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and E127.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXP.LE127.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.46%

-26.68%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-10.82%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-15.31%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-22.89%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.94%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-10.35%

+6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.01%

-1.08%

Volatility

SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) is 2.64%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that SPXP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E127.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXP.LE127.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

7.37%

-4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

14.21%

-6.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.56%

16.73%

-6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

16.17%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.38%

-0.16%

SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than E127.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Dividend Comparison

SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while E127.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
E127.L
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist
1.93%2.47%4.04%4.40%2.79%2.25%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXP.L and E127.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for E127.L.

SPXP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while E127.L is Emerging Markets Equities. SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while E127.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.14% for E127.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and E127.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer