SPXP.L vs. E127.L
SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and E127.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while E127.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPXP.L returned 15.15%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for E127.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXP.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for E127.L.
Performance
SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPXP.L is traded in GBp, while E127.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the E127.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXP.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than E127.L's 27.98% return.
SPXP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
E127.L
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 10.42%
- YTD
- 27.98%
- 6M
- 30.80%
- 1Y
- 58.40%
- 3Y*
- 22.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.75% |
E127.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist | 27.98% | 25.81% | 10.12% | 3.48% | -9.65% | -1.28% | 23.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXP.L and E127.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SPXP.L and E127.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXP.L
E127.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPXP.L
E127.L
Financial Services
SPXP.L
E127.L
Communication Services
SPXP.L
E127.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPXP.L
E127.L
Healthcare
SPXP.L
E127.L
Industrials
SPXP.L
E127.L
Consumer Defensive
SPXP.L
E127.L
Energy
SPXP.L
E127.L
Utilities
SPXP.L
E127.L
Real Estate
SPXP.L
E127.L
Basic Materials
SPXP.L
E127.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXP.L vs. E127.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPXP.L
E127.L
SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXP.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.64 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 5.37 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 19.32 | -4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXP.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 3.48 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.59 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.76 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, roughly equal to the maximum E127.L drawdown of -26.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and E127.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXP.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -26.68% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -10.82% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -15.31% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -22.89% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.94% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -10.35% | +6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 3.01% | -1.08% |
Volatility
SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) is 2.64%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that SPXP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E127.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXP.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 7.37% | -4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 14.21% | -6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 16.73% | -6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 16.17% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 16.38% | -0.16% |
SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than E127.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXP.L vs. E127.L - Dividend Comparison
SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while E127.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E127.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.93% | 2.47% | 4.04% | 4.40% | 2.79% | 2.25% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXP.L and E127.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for E127.L.
SPXP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while E127.L is Emerging Markets Equities. SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while E127.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.14% for E127.L.
Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and E127.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer