SPXM vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
SPXM and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPXM is an actively managed fund by Azoria. It was launched on Jul 7, 2025. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Performance
SPXM vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPXM vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.16% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | -1.41% | 5.97% |
Returns By Period
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPXM vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPXM vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
SPXM
BDGS
SPXM vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXM | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.83 | 1.51 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXM and BDGS is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SPXM vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than BDGS's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
SPXM vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, smaller than the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and BDGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXM | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -9.12% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -2.15% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -0.67% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility
SPXM vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPXM | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.38% | 10.70% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 8.35% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 8.35% | +1.03% |