SPXM vs. ACWV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV).

SPXM and ACWV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPXM is an actively managed fund by Azoria. It was launched on Jul 7, 2025. ACWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD). It was launched on Oct 18, 2011.

Performance

SPXM vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SPXM vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.00%	9.16%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	0.64%	1.84%

Returns By Period

SPXM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWV

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -4.54%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 6.10%
• 10Y*: 7.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXM vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

SPXM

Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF

ACWV

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF

Return for Risk

SPXM vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 30
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXM vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPXM	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.83	0.70	+1.13

Correlation

The correlation between SPXM and ACWV is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SPXM vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than ACWV's 2.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.07%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%

Drawdowns

SPXM vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, smaller than the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXM	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.08%	-28.82%	+23.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-4.54%	+3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-3.11%	+2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.73%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPXM	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.38%	10.76%	-1.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.38%	10.25%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.38%	12.31%	-2.93%