ACWV vs. VXUS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - ACWV tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index while VXUS tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWV returned 7.18%/yr vs 9.44%/yr for VXUS. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ACWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.

Performance

ACWV vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWV achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 12.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWV has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 7.18%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.44% annualized return.

ACWV

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 1.99%
• 6M: 4.00%
• YTD: 5.75%
• 1Y: 8.69%
• 3Y*: 10.41%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 7.18%
• ALL TIME*: 8.75%

VXUS

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -0.29%
• 6M: 6.78%
• YTD: 12.75%
• 1Y: 27.56%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 8.78%
• 10Y*: 9.44%
• ALL TIME*: 6.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	$12.13M	$11.24M	$12.40M
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF	$362.62M	$406.11M	$507.75M

ACWV vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	5.75%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	18.57%
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF	12.75%	32.35%	5.08%	15.86%	-16.08%	8.98%	10.66%	21.75%	-14.43%	27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWV and VXUS is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between ACWV and VXUS has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ACWV vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACWV	VXUS
Technology	25.3%	23.7%
Healthcare	13.8%	6.8%
Financial Services	13.5%	23.2%
Communication Services	11.3%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	9.7%	4.8%
Industrials	8.1%	14.5%
Utilities	7.5%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	6.8%
Energy	3.5%	4.2%
Basic Materials	1.5%	6.6%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.7%

Return for Risk

ACWV vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 44
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 39

VXUS

VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 71
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACWV vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACWV	VXUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	1.62	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.24	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.30	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	2.42	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	8.87	-4.77

ACWV vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWV Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWV and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACWV vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and VXUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWV	VXUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.82%	-35.97%	+7.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.37%	-11.27%	+4.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.56%	-13.58%	+6.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.14%	-29.44%	+11.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.82%	-35.97%	+7.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-2.84%	+2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.10%	-8.16%	+5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	3.07%	-0.83%

Volatility

ACWV vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) is 2.56%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that ACWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWV	VXUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	5.29%	-2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.41%	15.06%	-8.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.08%	16.86%	-8.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.30%	16.35%	-6.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.30%	17.03%	-4.73%

ACWV vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ACWV vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than VXUS's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.90%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF	2.59%	3.18%	3.37%	3.24%	3.09%	3.10%	2.14%	3.06%	3.18%	2.73%	2.93%	2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWV and VXUS in my portfolio?

ACWV and VXUS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACWV or VXUS?

VXUS has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to ACWV (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWV dropped -28.82% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

Which ETF is better, ACWV or VXUS?

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 9.44% vs 7.18% for ACWV. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACWV or VXUS?

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 9.44% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWV or VXUS?

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ACWV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACWV or VXUS?

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.90% for ACWV.

What is the main difference between ACWV and VXUS?

ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACWV and 0.05% for VXUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.