PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWV vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWV vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWV achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 16.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWV has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 7.32%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.57% annualized return.


ACWV

1D
-0.03%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.16%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
9.65%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
7.32%

VXUS

1D
0.33%
1M
3.54%
YTD
16.04%
6M
16.58%
1Y
34.50%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWV vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
1.31%11.04%11.38%8.23%-10.36%13.97%3.04%21.04%-1.42%18.57%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
16.04%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWV and VXUS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.78

The correlation between ACWV and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACWV vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWV
VXUS

Technology

25.8%
21.0%

Financial Services

13.2%
21.7%

Healthcare

13.0%
6.8%

Communication Services

11.9%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
4.8%

Industrials

8.1%
15.6%

Utilities

7.3%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
8.2%

Energy

3.7%
4.7%

Basic Materials

1.5%
7.6%

Real Estate

0.6%
2.4%

Technology

ACWV
25.8%
VXUS
21.0%

Financial Services

ACWV
13.2%
VXUS
21.7%

Healthcare

ACWV
13.0%
VXUS
6.8%

Communication Services

ACWV
11.9%
VXUS
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

ACWV
9.8%
VXUS
4.8%

Industrials

ACWV
8.1%
VXUS
15.6%

Utilities

ACWV
7.3%
VXUS
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWV
5.1%
VXUS
8.2%

Energy

ACWV
3.7%
VXUS
4.7%

Basic Materials

ACWV
1.5%
VXUS
7.6%

Real Estate

ACWV
0.6%
VXUS
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWV vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWV
ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWV vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACWVVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.40

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

3.07

-2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.29

11.84

-9.55

ACWV vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWV Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWV and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACWV vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWVVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.82%

-35.97%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.37%

-11.27%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.56%

-13.58%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

-29.44%

+11.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

-35.97%

+7.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

0.00%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-8.20%

+5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.92%

-0.78%

Volatility

ACWV vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) is 2.11%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that ACWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWVVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

6.28%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.70%

14.10%

-8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

16.08%

-8.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.23%

16.21%

-5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.31%

17.18%

-4.87%

ACWV vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ACWV vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than VXUS's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
1.98%2.09%2.33%2.41%2.18%1.92%1.77%2.54%2.32%2.04%2.56%2.28%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.51%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWV and VXUS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to ACWV (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWV dropped -28.82% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.57% vs 7.32% for ACWV. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ACWV.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.98% for ACWV.

ACWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACWV and 0.05% for VXUS.

VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWV and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer