PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXJ.L vs. XMME.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXJ.L vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPXJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPXJ.L is traded in GBp, while XMME.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XMME.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXJ.L achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 28.88% return.


SPXJ.L

1D
-0.92%
1M
0.58%
YTD
8.56%
6M
9.23%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
8.40%

XMME.DE

1D
-0.97%
1M
7.90%
YTD
28.88%
6M
29.70%
1Y
55.84%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXJ.L vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXJ.L
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
8.56%11.54%7.16%-1.01%4.28%5.67%1.82%15.19%-5.97%5.24%
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
28.88%24.87%8.86%3.78%-10.35%-2.64%12.59%15.56%-9.91%8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXJ.L and XMME.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017

0.62

The correlation between SPXJ.L and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXJ.L vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXJ.L
SPXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

XMME.DE
XMME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXJ.L vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPXJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXJ.LXMME.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.62

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

5.22

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

18.66

-11.80

SPXJ.L vs. XMME.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXJ.L and XMME.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXJ.LXMME.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

3.36

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.53

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.44

+0.11

Drawdowns

SPXJ.L vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -32.61%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXJ.L and XMME.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXJ.LXMME.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.61%

-27.82%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.39%

-10.98%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-16.66%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.62%

-24.41%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-0.97%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-10.06%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

3.08%

-0.63%

Volatility

SPXJ.L vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPXJ.L) is 3.81%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that SPXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXJ.LXMME.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

7.38%

-3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

14.60%

-6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

17.05%

-5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

16.44%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

18.35%

-0.95%

SPXJ.L vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXJ.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXJ.L vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison

SPXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, while XMME.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXJ.L
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.80%2.93%3.42%3.60%3.75%2.84%2.63%3.63%3.71%3.36%3.20%3.30%
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXJ.L and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SPXJ.L.

SPXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. SPXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPXJ.L and 0.18% for XMME.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXJ.L and XMME.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer