PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXE vs. QLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXE vs. QLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF (SPXE) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXE achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than QLC's 9.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPXE having a 15.98% annualized return and QLC not far behind at 15.29%.


SPXE

1D
-0.06%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
7.53%
6M
6.26%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.98%

QLC

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
9.54%
6M
7.97%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
24.09%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
15.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXE vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
7.53%18.03%25.72%27.71%-20.58%27.93%20.62%32.45%-5.52%24.99%
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
9.54%23.26%26.71%26.02%-17.21%28.46%13.64%24.51%-8.12%21.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXE and QLC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.84

The correlation between SPXE and QLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.98 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXE vs. QLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXE
QLC

Technology

39.1%
37.8%

Financial Services

12.1%
13.2%

Communication Services

10.4%
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
7.8%

Healthcare

9.0%
9.6%

Industrials

8.1%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.0%

Utilities

2.6%
3.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.0%

Energy

0.0%
2.0%

Technology

SPXE
39.1%
QLC
37.8%

Financial Services

SPXE
12.1%
QLC
13.2%

Communication Services

SPXE
10.4%
QLC
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXE
9.8%
QLC
7.8%

Healthcare

SPXE
9.0%
QLC
9.6%

Industrials

SPXE
8.1%
QLC
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPXE
4.9%
QLC
3.0%

Utilities

SPXE
2.6%
QLC
3.1%

Real Estate

SPXE
1.9%
QLC
2.1%

Basic Materials

SPXE
1.8%
QLC
2.0%

Energy

SPXE
0.0%
QLC
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXE vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXE
SPXE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SPXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

QLC
QLC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXE vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF (SPXE) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXEQLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.18

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

14.39

-4.92

SPXE vs. QLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXE Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the QLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXE and QLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXE vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXE drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXE and QLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXEQLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.27%

-35.86%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-8.84%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-18.49%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.50%

-23.81%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.27%

-35.86%

+3.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-2.38%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-4.52%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

1.95%

+0.35%

Volatility

SPXE vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF (SPXE) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXEQLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.71%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

10.27%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

12.92%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

16.91%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

18.45%

-1.02%

SPXE vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXE vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison

SPXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, which matches QLC's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
0.95%0.94%1.03%1.26%1.46%0.96%1.40%1.91%1.82%1.29%1.80%0.64%
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
0.95%0.99%1.09%1.29%1.49%0.94%1.16%1.38%1.61%1.65%1.53%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SPXE and QLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QLC has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to SPXE (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXE dropped -32.27% vs QLC's -35.86%.

On 10-year performance, SPXE leads with 15.98% vs 15.29% for QLC. On fees, SPXE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXE has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 15.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.

SPXE and QLC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.95%.

SPXE is categorized as S&P 500, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPXE tracks S&P 500 Ex-Energy Index, while QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXE and 0.25% for QLC.

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXE and QLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer