PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXC vs. USLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SPXC vs. USLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPX Corporation (SPXC) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXC achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than USLM's -9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXC has outperformed USLM with an annualized return of 31.53%, while USLM has yielded a comparatively lower 26.57% annualized return.


SPXC

1D
-1.47%
1M
12.89%
YTD
14.99%
6M
4.60%
1Y
44.90%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
31.04%
10Y*
31.53%

USLM

1D
2.30%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
-9.38%
6M
-17.05%
1Y
8.96%
3Y*
41.21%
5Y*
31.26%
10Y*
26.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXC vs. USLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXC
SPX Corporation
14.99%37.48%44.06%53.86%10.00%9.42%7.19%81.65%-10.77%32.34%
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
-9.38%-9.59%188.91%64.34%9.84%13.69%27.15%35.03%-7.26%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXC and USLM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.19

The correlation between SPXC and USLM shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SPXC:

$5.19

USLM:

$6.07

PE Ratio

SPXC:

44.34

USLM:

17.87

PEG Ratio

SPXC:

0.01

USLM:

0.46

PS Ratio

SPXC:

4.78

USLM:

6.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

SPXC:

$2.35B

USLM:

$369.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SPXC:

$909.30M

USLM:

$177.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

SPXC:

$475.30M

USLM:

$185.83M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXC vs. USLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXC
SPXC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

USLM
USLM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
USLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
USLM Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
USLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
USLM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXC vs. USLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPX Corporation (SPXC) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXCUSLMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.08

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

0.34

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

0.79

+4.20

SPXC vs. USLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the USLM Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXC and USLM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXC vs. USLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXC drawdown since its inception was -81.12%, which is greater than USLM's maximum drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXC and USLM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXCUSLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.12%

-77.09%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.15%

-26.55%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.54%

-45.87%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.32%

-45.87%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.26%

-45.87%

-4.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.34%

-30.93%

+25.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.01%

-27.35%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.04%

11.39%

-2.35%

Volatility

SPXC vs. USLM - Volatility Comparison

SPX Corporation (SPXC) has a higher volatility of 11.30% compared to United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) at 9.89%. This indicates that SPXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXCUSLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.30%

9.89%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.00%

32.08%

-4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.72%

40.42%

-3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.14%

35.95%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.46%

36.38%

+1.08%

Dividends

SPXC vs. USLM - Dividend Comparison

SPXC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXC
SPX Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%386.22%
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
0.22%0.20%0.15%0.35%0.57%0.50%0.56%6.52%0.76%0.70%0.66%0.91%

Financials

SPXC vs. USLM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SPX Corporation and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
566.80M
87.83M
(SPXC) Total Revenue
(USLM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SPXC vs. USLM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SPX Corporation and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
40.7%
47.5%
Portfolio components
SPXC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SPX Corporation reported a gross profit of 230.60M and revenue of 566.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

USLM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.75M and revenue of 87.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.

SPXC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SPX Corporation reported an operating income of 87.70M and revenue of 566.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.5%.

USLM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.78M and revenue of 87.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.7%.

SPXC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SPX Corporation reported a net income of 59.90M and revenue of 566.80M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

USLM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a net income of 30.58M and revenue of 87.83M, resulting in a net margin of 34.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPXC and USLM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXC has higher volatility (11.30%) compared to USLM (9.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXC dropped -81.12% vs USLM's -77.09%.

SPXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXC and USLM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer