SPXB vs. SSO
SPXB (ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the S&P 500 MarketAxess Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPXB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
SPXB vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPXB
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 52.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.21%
SPXB vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXB ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.45% | 8.83% | -16.66% | -1.89% | 10.33% | 15.34% | 1.13% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 19.37% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXB and SSO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXB vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
SPXB
SSO
SPXB vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF (SPXB) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXB | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.42 | — |
Drawdowns
SPXB vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXB | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -84.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.40% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -19.57% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility
SPXB vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXB | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 23.60% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 33.65% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 35.89% | — |
SPXB vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXB vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
SPXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXB ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.22% | 4.04% | 3.14% | 2.00% | 2.64% | 3.48% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXB and SSO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for SPXB.
SPXB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. SPXB tracks S&P 500 MarketAxess Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPXB and 0.87% for SSO.
Find the right allocation for SPXB and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer