PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPX5.L is traded in GBP, while XS2D.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XS2D.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPX5.L achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 17.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SPX5.L has underperformed XS2D.L with an annualized return of 14.52%, while XS2D.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.29% annualized return.


SPX5.L

1D
-0.52%
1M
-0.34%
6M
9.55%
YTD
10.01%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
14.52%

XS2D.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.25%
6M
16.31%
YTD
17.14%
1Y
37.73%
3Y*
32.04%
5Y*
19.19%
10Y*
23.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.01%9.34%27.46%19.76%-9.00%30.96%13.52%26.33%-0.90%10.29%
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
17.14%17.56%48.20%41.43%-31.85%64.57%17.41%56.67%-10.94%31.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SPX5.L and XS2D.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2012

0.91

The correlation between SPX5.L and XS2D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPX5.L
XS2D.L

Technology

39.1%
56.8%

Financial Services

11.1%
6.0%

Communication Services

10.8%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
5.7%

Industrials

7.8%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
0.0%

Energy

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.1%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.3%
2.2%

Technology

SPX5.L
39.1%
XS2D.L
56.8%

Financial Services

SPX5.L
11.1%
XS2D.L
6.0%

Communication Services

SPX5.L
10.8%
XS2D.L
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPX5.L
9.9%
XS2D.L
9.3%

Healthcare

SPX5.L
8.4%
XS2D.L
5.7%

Industrials

SPX5.L
7.8%
XS2D.L
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPX5.L
4.5%
XS2D.L
0.0%

Energy

SPX5.L
3.2%
XS2D.L

-

Utilities

SPX5.L
2.1%
XS2D.L
4.9%

Real Estate

SPX5.L
1.8%
XS2D.L
2.4%

Basic Materials

SPX5.L
1.3%
XS2D.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPX5.L
SPX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XS2D.L
XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPX5.LXS2D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

2.38

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

8.62

+1.89

SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPX5.L and XS2D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPX5.L drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, smaller than the maximum XS2D.L drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPX5.L and XS2D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPX5.LXS2D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.23%

-54.44%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-15.77%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-36.46%

+15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.90%

-37.20%

+16.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.45%

-54.44%

+28.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-2.41%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-8.12%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

4.36%

-2.38%

Volatility

SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) is 2.87%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that SPX5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPX5.LXS2D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

5.47%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.83%

17.88%

-10.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

23.63%

-12.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

30.26%

-15.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.41%

31.29%

-15.88%

SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPX5.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPX5.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison

SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while XS2D.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.92%0.98%1.03%1.21%1.39%0.98%1.40%1.48%0.78%1.19%1.49%1.68%
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SPX5.L and XS2D.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPX5.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPX5.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.

SPX5.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XS2D.L is Leveraged Equities. SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPX5.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPX5.L and XS2D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer