PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPX5.L vs. WNRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPX5.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (WNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPX5.L is traded in GBP, while WNRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WNRG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPX5.L achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than WNRG.L's 24.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SPX5.L has outperformed WNRG.L with an annualized return of 14.52%, while WNRG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.31% annualized return.


SPX5.L

1D
-0.52%
1M
-0.34%
6M
9.55%
YTD
10.01%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
14.52%

WNRG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.01%
6M
17.92%
YTD
24.32%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
20.41%
10Y*
8.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPX5.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.01%9.34%27.46%19.76%-9.00%30.96%13.52%26.33%-0.90%10.29%
WNRG.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF
24.32%6.65%3.85%-1.65%64.04%40.05%-32.40%5.71%-9.95%-4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SPX5.L and WNRG.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2012

0.45

The correlation between SPX5.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPX5.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPX5.L
SPX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

WNRG.L
WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPX5.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPX5.LWNRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.98

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

5.17

+5.35

SPX5.L vs. WNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPX5.L and WNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPX5.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPX5.L drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, smaller than the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPX5.L and WNRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPX5.LWNRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.23%

-59.34%

+18.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-16.52%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-21.66%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.90%

-22.11%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.45%

-59.34%

+33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-12.57%

+11.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-12.66%

+5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

6.33%

-4.35%

Volatility

SPX5.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) is 2.87%, while State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (WNRG.L) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that SPX5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPX5.LWNRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

6.73%

-3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.83%

18.58%

-10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

21.43%

-10.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

23.88%

-9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.41%

33.21%

-17.80%

SPX5.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPX5.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPX5.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while WNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.92%0.98%1.03%1.21%1.39%0.98%1.40%1.48%0.78%1.19%1.49%1.68%
WNRG.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPX5.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPX5.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPX5.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNRG.L.

SPX5.L is categorized as S&P 500, while WNRG.L is Global Equities. SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while WNRG.L tracks State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPX5.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPX5.L and WNRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer