PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPX5.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.53%
YTD
10.53%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
16.17%

LCUS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.53%9.34%27.47%19.75%-9.01%30.96%13.52%26.74%4.55%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%3.57%27.38%20.34%-12.04%27.36%14.33%24.68%2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SPX5.L and LCUS.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.90

The correlation between SPX5.L and LCUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPX5.L
LCUS.L

Technology

35.6%
31.9%

Financial Services

11.8%
13.6%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
10.4%

Industrials

8.3%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.3%

Energy

3.5%
3.1%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SPX5.L
35.6%
LCUS.L
31.9%

Financial Services

SPX5.L
11.8%
LCUS.L
13.6%

Communication Services

SPX5.L
11.2%
LCUS.L
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPX5.L
10.1%
LCUS.L
11.6%

Healthcare

SPX5.L
8.5%
LCUS.L
10.4%

Industrials

SPX5.L
8.3%
LCUS.L
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPX5.L
4.9%
LCUS.L
5.3%

Energy

SPX5.L
3.5%
LCUS.L
3.1%

Utilities

SPX5.L
2.3%
LCUS.L
2.4%

Real Estate

SPX5.L
1.9%
LCUS.L
2.1%

Basic Materials

SPX5.L
1.8%
LCUS.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPX5.L
SPX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPX5.LLCUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.08

SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPX5.LLCUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

Drawdowns

SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPX5.LLCUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

Volatility

SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPX5.LLCUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPX5.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Dividend Comparison

SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while LCUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.83%0.77%0.69%0.48%0.02%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.89%0.98%1.04%1.21%1.39%0.98%1.40%1.76%1.71%2.36%1.49%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SPX5.L and LCUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LCUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPX5.L.

SPX5.L is categorized as S&P 500, while LCUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while LCUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPX5.L and 0.04% for LCUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPX5.L and LCUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer