SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L
SPX5.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and LCUS.L (Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPX5.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while LCUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPX5.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUS.L.
Performance
SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPX5.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
LCUS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPX5.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.53% | 9.34% | 27.47% | 19.75% | -9.01% | 30.96% | 13.52% | 26.74% | 4.55% |
LCUS.L Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 3.57% | 27.38% | 20.34% | -12.04% | 27.36% | 14.33% | 24.68% | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPX5.L and LCUS.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SPX5.L and LCUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Financial Services
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Communication Services
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Healthcare
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Industrials
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Consumer Defensive
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Energy
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Utilities
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Real Estate
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Basic Materials
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPX5.L
LCUS.L
SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPX5.L | LCUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPX5.L | LCUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPX5.L | LCUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | — | — |
Volatility
SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPX5.L | LCUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.50% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | — | — |
SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPX5.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPX5.L vs. LCUS.L - Dividend Comparison
SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while LCUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUS.L Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.83% | 0.77% | 0.69% | 0.48% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPX5.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.98% | 1.40% | 1.76% | 1.71% | 2.36% | 1.49% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SPX5.L and LCUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LCUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPX5.L.
SPX5.L is categorized as S&P 500, while LCUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while LCUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPX5.L and 0.04% for LCUS.L.
Find the right allocation for SPX5.L and LCUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer