PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPX5.L is traded in GBP, while HDLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HDLG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPX5.L achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than HDLG.L's 11.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SPX5.L has outperformed HDLG.L with an annualized return of 15.49%, while HDLG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.


SPX5.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
9.51%
6M
9.69%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
15.49%

HDLG.L

1D
1.19%
1M
4.52%
YTD
11.55%
6M
12.92%
1Y
18.62%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
7.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
9.51%9.34%27.46%19.76%-9.00%30.96%13.52%26.33%-0.04%10.71%
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
11.55%-3.57%18.46%-4.52%12.44%26.47%-13.89%15.07%-1.67%1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SPX5.L and HDLG.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2015

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between SPX5.L and HDLG.L has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPX5.L
HDLG.L

Technology

39.1%
1.5%

Financial Services

11.1%
16.8%

Communication Services

10.8%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
3.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
4.9%

Industrials

7.8%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
18.3%

Energy

3.2%
11.7%

Utilities

2.1%
14.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
21.2%

Basic Materials

1.3%
0.0%

Technology

SPX5.L
39.1%
HDLG.L
1.5%

Financial Services

SPX5.L
11.1%
HDLG.L
16.8%

Communication Services

SPX5.L
10.8%
HDLG.L
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPX5.L
9.9%
HDLG.L
3.7%

Healthcare

SPX5.L
8.4%
HDLG.L
4.9%

Industrials

SPX5.L
7.8%
HDLG.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPX5.L
4.5%
HDLG.L
18.3%

Energy

SPX5.L
3.2%
HDLG.L
11.7%

Utilities

SPX5.L
2.1%
HDLG.L
14.0%

Real Estate

SPX5.L
1.8%
HDLG.L
21.2%

Basic Materials

SPX5.L
1.3%
HDLG.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPX5.L
SPX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

HDLG.L
HDLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPX5.LHDLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.29

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

2.68

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.34

6.82

+6.52

SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPX5.L and HDLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPX5.L drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, which is greater than HDLG.L's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPX5.L and HDLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPX5.LHDLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.23%

-38.91%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-6.92%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-15.61%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.90%

-17.84%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.45%

-33.75%

+8.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

0.00%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

-9.18%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.72%

-0.75%

Volatility

SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) have volatilities of 3.50% and 3.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPX5.LHDLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

3.53%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

8.49%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

10.75%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.28%

13.00%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.43%

15.54%

-0.11%

SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPX5.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPX5.L vs. HDLG.L - Dividend Comparison

SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than HDLG.L's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
3.49%3.94%3.46%4.11%3.49%3.30%4.65%3.77%3.67%3.17%2.88%1.86%
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.92%0.98%1.03%1.21%1.39%0.98%1.40%1.48%1.71%1.57%1.49%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPX5.L and HDLG.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPX5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPX5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLG.L.

SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while HDLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPX5.L and 0.30% for HDLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPX5.L and HDLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer