SPX5.L vs. 5ESG.L
SPX5.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and 5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) are both S&P 500 funds - SPX5.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while 5ESG.L tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPX5.L returned 13.52%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for 5ESG.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPX5.L charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for 5ESG.L.
Performance
SPX5.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPX5.L is traded in GBP, while 5ESG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 5ESG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPX5.L achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.L's 9.11% return.
SPX5.L
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 20.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
5ESG.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SPX5.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPX5.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.01% | 9.34% | 27.46% | 19.76% | -9.00% | 30.96% | 13.52% | 16.26% |
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 9.11% | 18.26% | 23.62% | 26.17% | -20.24% | 31.59% | 15.83% | 16.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPX5.L and 5ESG.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SPX5.L and 5ESG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPX5.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Financial Services
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Communication Services
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Healthcare
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Industrials
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Defensive
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Energy
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Utilities
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Real Estate
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Basic Materials
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPX5.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPX5.L
5ESG.L
SPX5.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPX5.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 2.54 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | 10.84 | -0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPX5.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPX5.L drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, which is greater than 5ESG.L's maximum drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPX5.L and 5ESG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPX5.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.23% | -36.07% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -9.01% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -19.53% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -25.41% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.96% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -5.34% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.12% | -0.14% |
Volatility
SPX5.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPX5.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 2.77% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.83% | 9.38% | -1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 11.94% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 16.24% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.41% | 18.00% | -2.59% |
SPX5.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPX5.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPX5.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison
SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than 5ESG.L's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 0.62% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPX5.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.92% | 0.98% | 1.03% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.98% | 1.40% | 1.48% | 0.78% | 1.19% | 1.49% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPX5.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPX5.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPX5.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPX5.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
Find the right allocation for SPX5.L and 5ESG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer