PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUT vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUT vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUT achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 10.81% return.


SPUT

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.05%
YTD
7.26%
6M
7.80%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAPR

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.21%
YTD
10.81%
6M
11.74%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUT vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPUT and BAPR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025

0.87

The correlation between SPUT and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUT vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUT
BAPR

Technology

35.7%
36.2%

Communication Services

11.7%
10.9%

Financial Services

11.1%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.4%

Industrials

8.4%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

3.6%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

SPUT
35.7%
BAPR
36.2%

Communication Services

SPUT
11.7%
BAPR
10.9%

Financial Services

SPUT
11.1%
BAPR
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUT
10.2%
BAPR
10.1%

Healthcare

SPUT
8.7%
BAPR
8.4%

Industrials

SPUT
8.4%
BAPR
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPUT
4.8%
BAPR
4.9%

Energy

SPUT
3.6%
BAPR
3.5%

Utilities

SPUT
2.3%
BAPR
2.3%

Basic Materials

SPUT
1.8%
BAPR
1.8%

Real Estate

SPUT
1.8%
BAPR
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUT vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUT
SPUT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUT vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUTBAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.87

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

10.46

-5.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.62

57.55

-34.93

SPUT vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUT Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUT and BAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUTBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

3.59

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

0.84

+0.71

Drawdowns

SPUT vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUT drawdown since its inception was -10.55%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUT and BAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUTBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-23.91%

+13.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-1.93%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.23%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-2.59%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.35%

+0.48%

Volatility

SPUT vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 1.06%. This indicates that SPUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUTBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.06%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

4.53%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.24%

5.64%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.26%

11.49%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

13.12%

-1.86%

SPUT vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPUT and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

SPUT vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

SPUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, while BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPUT and BAPR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUT has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to BAPR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUT dropped -10.55% vs BAPR's -23.91%.

On 1-year performance, BAPR leads with 20.12% vs 18.82% for SPUT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 18.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUT and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

SPUT has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 0.00% for BAPR.

SPUT is categorized as Derivative Income, while BAPR is Defined Outcome.

BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUT and BAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer