PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUS vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUS vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.


SPUS

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.54%
6M
9.78%
YTD
10.68%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
14.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.05%

SBIT

1D
5.60%
1M
-6.04%
6M
32.41%
YTD
39.44%
1Y
98.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.57M$32.71M$46.48M
$23.25M$21.17M$26.78M

SPUS vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
10.68%19.77%13.99%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
39.44%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUS and SBIT is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUS vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPUS vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPUSSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.35

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

5.19

+2.34

SPUS vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUS and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUS vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUSSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-91.35%

+60.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-47.94%

+37.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.26%

-77.87%

+72.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-69.07%

+62.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

21.67%

-18.57%

Volatility

SPUS vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is 4.66%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that SPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUSSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

18.09%

-13.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

67.10%

-54.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

88.65%

-72.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.49%

96.10%

-76.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

96.10%

-74.84%

SPUS vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUS vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SBIT's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
4.03%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.54%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUS and SBIT have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to SPUS (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 25.03% for SPUS. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 25.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.54% for SPUS.

SPUS is categorized as S&P 500, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 0.95% for SBIT.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUS and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer