SPUS vs. ^IMUS
Compare and contrast key facts about SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index (^IMUS).
SPUS is a passively managed fund by Toroso Investments that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. It was launched on Dec 18, 2019.
Performance
SPUS vs. ^IMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPUS vs. ^IMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | -5.55% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.81% |
^IMUS Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index | -5.56% | 16.79% | 24.16% | 32.07% | -25.45% | 27.79% | 28.19% | 1.38% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPUS having a -5.55% return and ^IMUS slightly lower at -5.56%.
SPUS
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -5.55%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
^IMUS
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -5.56%
- 6M
- -2.64%
- 1Y
- 20.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 13.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUS vs. ^IMUS — Risk / Return Rank
SPUS
^IMUS
SPUS vs. ^IMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index (^IMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPUS | ^IMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.88 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.39 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.02 | +0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.40 | 4.26 | +4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPUS | ^IMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.88 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.53 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.41 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUS and ^IMUS is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Drawdowns
SPUS vs. ^IMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum ^IMUS drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and ^IMUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUS | ^IMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -47.72% | +16.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -12.76% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.06% | -29.97% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.77% | -8.04% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -9.66% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.64% | +0.34% |
Volatility
SPUS vs. ^IMUS - Volatility Comparison
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index (^IMUS) have volatilities of 6.04% and 5.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPUS | ^IMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 5.87% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.25% | 9.93% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.90% | 18.86% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 18.94% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 19.33% | +2.10% |