PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUBX vs. WLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUBX vs. WLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Symmetry Panoramic US Fixed Income Fund (SPUBX) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUBX achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than WLDR's 29.98% return.


SPUBX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-1.48%
6M
-1.07%
YTD
-0.96%
1Y
1.56%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.76%

WLDR

1D
1.15%
1M
3.17%
6M
21.17%
YTD
29.98%
1Y
49.01%
3Y*
30.33%
5Y*
18.04%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.08M$815.02K$665.85K

SPUBX vs. WLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPUBX
Symmetry Panoramic US Fixed Income Fund
-0.96%7.23%1.15%5.32%-9.45%-1.72%5.63%5.91%1.56%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
29.98%31.24%22.74%18.93%-10.44%26.77%-1.93%21.54%-11.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUBX and WLDR is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2018

0.05

Over the past year, SPUBX and WLDR have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUBX vs. WLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPUBX
SPUBX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SPUBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

WLDR
WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPUBX vs. WLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic US Fixed Income Fund (SPUBX) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPUBXWLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.47

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

5.56

-4.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.15

19.28

-17.14

SPUBX vs. WLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the WLDR Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUBX and WLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUBX vs. WLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUBX drawdown since its inception was -13.72%, smaller than the maximum WLDR drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUBX and WLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUBXWLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-44.69%

+30.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

-8.86%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.86%

-20.30%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.17%

-23.77%

+10.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-2.20%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-8.52%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

2.55%

-1.42%

Volatility

SPUBX vs. WLDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Symmetry Panoramic US Fixed Income Fund (SPUBX) is 1.12%, while Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that SPUBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUBXWLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

6.61%

-5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

14.90%

-11.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

17.59%

-13.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.78%

17.57%

-12.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

21.04%

-16.90%

SPUBX vs. WLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUBX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDR's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUBX vs. WLDR - Dividend Comparison

SPUBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than WLDR's 7.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SPUBX
Symmetry Panoramic US Fixed Income Fund
4.00%4.31%4.57%2.52%1.61%1.16%1.82%2.14%0.16%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
7.16%9.01%13.99%2.28%2.10%7.55%1.80%2.48%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUBX and WLDR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLDR has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to SPUBX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUBX dropped -13.72% vs WLDR's -44.69%.

WLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUBX and WLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer