SPTU vs. XLK
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
SPTU vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return.
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
SPTU vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and XLK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
XLK
SPTU vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPTU | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 11.82 | 0.42 | +11.41 |
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -82.05% | +82.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.00% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -34.96% | +34.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32% | 20.82% | -20.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 24.90% | -24.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 24.49% | -24.17% |
SPTU vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTU vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and XLK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLK.
SPTU has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.
SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while XLK is Technology Equities. SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer