SPTU vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. SPTU is passively managed, while MINT is actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.

Performance

SPTU vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.81% return.

SPTU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MINT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTU vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF	1.48%	0.92%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.81%	1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTU and MINT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

SPTU vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTU vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPTU	MINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	5.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	2.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	11.82	2.47	+9.36

Drawdowns

SPTU vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum MINT drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPTU	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.04%	-4.62%	+4.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.05%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-0.17%	+0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPTU	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32%	0.27%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.32%	0.58%	-0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.32%	0.95%	-0.63%

SPTU vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPTU vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF	2.36%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPTU and MINT in my portfolio?

SPTU and MINT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPTU or MINT?

On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPTU or MINT?

SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPTU or MINT?

MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.

What is the main difference between SPTU and MINT?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.36% for MINT.