SPTU vs. GNOM
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and GNOM (Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while GNOM is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Solactive Genomics Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GNOM.
Performance
SPTU vs. GNOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than GNOM's 13.87% return.
SPTU
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GNOM
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 11.22%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 60.77%
- 3Y*
- 2.58%
- 5Y*
- -10.84%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU vs. GNOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.63% | 0.87% |
GNOM Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF | 13.87% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and GNOM is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. GNOM — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GNOM
SPTU vs. GNOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTU | GNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. GNOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum GNOM drawdown of -75.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and GNOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | GNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -75.00% | +74.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -72.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -52.95% | +52.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -40.62% | +40.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.32% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. GNOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | GNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 27.34% | -27.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.33% | 33.68% | -33.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.33% | 34.18% | -33.85% |
SPTU vs. GNOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GNOM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPTU vs. GNOM - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than GNOM's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNOM Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.14% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and GNOM have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GNOM.
SPTU has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.21% for GNOM.
SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GNOM is Health & Biotech Equities. SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while GNOM tracks Solactive Genomics Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.50% for GNOM.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and GNOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer