PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTU vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTU vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 3.00% return.


SPTU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDM

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
3.00%
6M
5.60%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTU vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPTU and GLDM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTU vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTU

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTU vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPTU vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPTUGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

11.82

1.02

+10.81

Drawdowns

SPTU vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTUGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-21.63%

+21.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.65%

+17.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-6.22%

+6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.69%

Volatility

SPTU vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTUGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32%

26.39%

-26.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.32%

17.91%

-17.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.32%

16.85%

-16.53%

SPTU vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPTU vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPTU and GLDM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

SPTU has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GLDM is Gold. SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.10% for GLDM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTU and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer