SPTU vs. COM
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and COM (Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while COM is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for COM.
Performance
SPTU vs. COM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than COM's 12.48% return.
SPTU
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COM
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.63% | 0.87% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 12.48% | 2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and COM is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COM
SPTU vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTU | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum COM drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and COM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -15.95% | +15.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -6.61% | +6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -6.28% | +6.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. COM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 10.54% | -10.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.33% | 9.53% | -9.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.33% | 9.76% | -9.43% |
SPTU vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPTU vs. COM - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than COM's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.51% | 2.99% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and COM have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for COM.
COM has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while COM is Commodities. SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while COM tracks Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.70% for COM.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and COM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer