SPTU vs. CLIP
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds - SPTU tracks the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index while CLIP tracks the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.
Performance
SPTU vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPTU having a 1.66% return and CLIP slightly higher at 1.71%.
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLIP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.66% | 0.87% |
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.71% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and CLIP is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLIP
SPTU vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTU | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 26.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 141.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1,281.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum CLIP drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and CLIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.08% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 0.22% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.33% | 0.44% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.33% | 0.44% | -0.11% |
SPTU vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTU vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than CLIP's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.90% | 4.14% | 5.11% | 2.75% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and CLIP have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for CLIP.
CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while CLIP tracks Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.07% for CLIP.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and CLIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer