SPTU vs. BWET
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.
Performance
SPTU vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 995.07% return.
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWET
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 731.53%
- YTD
- 995.07%
- 1Y
- 1,761.96%
- 3Y*
- 120.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.86% | 0.87% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 995.07% | 38.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and BWET is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BWET
SPTU vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTU | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.89 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 43.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 163.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -56.90% | +56.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -41.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.12% | +3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -23.71% | +23.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.90% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 42.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 95.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32% | 105.04% | -104.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 73.53% | -73.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 73.53% | -73.21% |
SPTU vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPTU vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.66% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and BWET have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
SPTU has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.
SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BWET is Commodities. SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 3.50% for BWET.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer