SPTL vs. XLV
SPTL (SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPTL returned -1.81%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for XLV. Their -0.17 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SPTL charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
SPTL vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTL achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's 5.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTL has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of -1.81%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.81% annualized return.
SPTL
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- 6M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 1Y
- -1.73%
- 3Y*
- -0.59%
- 5Y*
- -7.09%
- 10Y*
- -1.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.09%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $141.08M | $126.11M | $146.73M | |
| $1.43B | $1.62B | $1.62B |
SPTL vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | -3.28% | 5.28% | -6.23% | 3.30% | -29.44% | -4.99% | 18.07% | 13.74% | -1.57% | 9.01% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.90% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTL and XLV is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007 | -0.17 |
The correlation between SPTL and XLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTL vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
SPTL
XLV
SPTL vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTL | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.30 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.57 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 6.15 | -6.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTL vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTL drawdown since its inception was -46.20%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTL and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTL | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.20% | -39.17% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -10.47% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.39% | -17.11% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.02% | -17.11% | -23.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.20% | -28.40% | -17.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.71% | -2.82% | -35.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.43% | -7.09% | -7.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 4.37% | -1.16% |
Volatility
SPTL vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) is 2.26%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that SPTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTL | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 6.03% | -3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.39% | 12.07% | -5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.51% | 15.90% | -7.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 15.04% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 16.66% | -2.78% |
SPTL vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTL has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTL vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
SPTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than XLV's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | 3.99% | 4.12% | 4.03% | 3.24% | 2.75% | 1.68% | 1.71% | 2.45% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 2.60% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.56% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTL and XLV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to SPTL (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTL dropped -46.20% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.81% vs -1.81% for SPTL. On fees, SPTL is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTL has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.81% return vs -1.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTL is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLV.
SPTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 1.56% for XLV.
SPTL is categorized as Government Bonds, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. SPTL tracks Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTL and 0.08% for XLV.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPTL and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer