SPTL vs. GBIL
SPTL (SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - SPTL tracks the Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index while GBIL tracks the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPTL returned -7.09%/yr vs 3.44%/yr for GBIL. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SPTL charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.
Performance
SPTL vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTL achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 1.99% return.
SPTL
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- 6M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 1Y
- -1.73%
- 3Y*
- -0.59%
- 5Y*
- -7.09%
- 10Y*
- -1.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.09%
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.17M | $51.25M | $70.01M | |
| $141.08M | $126.11M | $146.73M |
SPTL vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | -3.28% | 5.28% | -6.23% | 3.30% | -29.44% | -4.99% | 18.07% | 13.74% | -1.57% | 9.01% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 1.99% | 4.12% | 5.24% | 4.91% | 1.05% | -0.08% | 0.79% | 2.31% | 1.78% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTL and GBIL is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTL vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
SPTL
GBIL
SPTL vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTL | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -154.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 95.18 | -94.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 192.70 | -192.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 2,308.02 | -2,308.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTL vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTL drawdown since its inception was -46.20%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTL and GBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTL | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.20% | -0.76% | -45.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -0.02% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.39% | -0.76% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.02% | -0.76% | -40.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.71% | 0.00% | -38.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.43% | -0.04% | -14.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 0.00% | +3.21% |
Volatility
SPTL vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that SPTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTL | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 0.07% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.39% | 0.14% | +6.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.51% | 0.22% | +8.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 0.58% | +13.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 0.47% | +13.41% |
SPTL vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTL has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTL vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
SPTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than GBIL's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.36% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% | 0.00% |
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | 3.99% | 4.12% | 4.03% | 3.24% | 2.75% | 1.68% | 1.71% | 2.45% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTL and GBIL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPTL has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to GBIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTL dropped -46.20% vs GBIL's -0.76%.
On 5-year performance, GBIL leads with 3.44% vs -7.09% for SPTL. On fees, SPTL is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GBIL has performed better with a 3.44% return vs -7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTL is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GBIL.
SPTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.36% for GBIL.
SPTL tracks Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTL and 0.12% for GBIL.
GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.26 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPTL and GBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer